JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 4 SUBSECTION (3) REGULATION OF GENERAL ELECTION COMMISSION OF REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 20 YEAR 2018 AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS OF THE CANDIDATURE OF LEGISLATIVE MEMBERS

Pahlevi Mooduto, Reza (2019) JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 4 SUBSECTION (3) REGULATION OF GENERAL ELECTION COMMISSION OF REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 20 YEAR 2018 AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS OF THE CANDIDATURE OF LEGISLATIVE MEMBERS. Bachelor thesis, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.

[thumbnail of T1_1400024028_NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf] Text
T1_1400024028_NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf

Download (429kB)

Abstract

The aims of this study were to find out the rationale of General Election
Commission (KPU) in assign the Article 4 sub section (3) PKPU Number 20 Year 2018
which is reflect discrimination point of view, to find out the implication of the Article 4
sub section (3) PKPU Number 20 Year 2018 toward the suffrage of the legislative
prospective candidate before the verdict of the Supreme Court (MA), to find out the
implication of the verdict of Supreme Court about PKPU Number 20 Year 2018 toward
the suffrage of the legislative prospective who have a status of ex-convicted of
narcotics, crime against children and corruption.
The type of the research used in this study was normative juridical. That type of
research chosen because this research study the positive sources of law, those are UUD
1945, UU No 7 Year 2017 and PKPU No 20 Year 2018. Data source in this study was
primary and secondary data. Data collecting method was using library study. Then, the
author analyzing the data by processes the legal material collected systematically to
produce the result which can be answer the formulation of the problem in this study.
Based on the study done by the author, it can be concluded that the Article 4 Sub
section (3) PKPU Number 20 Year 2018 not in conflict with the Law of General
Election. The supervisor institution of General Election (BAWASLU) as the organizer
of the general election can take the decisions that do not refers to PKPU Number 20
Year 2018. The Supreme Court (MA) who has a right to decide on the material test has
ruled out the principle of fairness and benefit. The suggestion given to this study was
there is a need for restrictions on the political right of ex-convicted of narcotics, crime
against children and corruption in the Law of general election.

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelor)
Subjects: J Political Science > J General legislative and executive papers
Divisi / Prodi: Faculty of Law (Fakultas Hukum) > S1-Law Science (S1-Hukum)
Depositing User: publikasi uad
Date Deposited: 15 Oct 2019 06:43
Last Modified: 15 Oct 2019 06:43
URI: http://eprints.uad.ac.id/id/eprint/15334

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item